Introduction
Consistent with the commonwealth's history of robust consumer
protections, such as automobile lemon laws1 and treble
damages for unfair business practices,2 Massachusetts
leads the nation with respect to state health care reform. While
federal consumer protections exist, often these laws are not as
protective as individual state laws. However, federal health reform
encompasses many important consumer protections in regard to access
to health insurance.
Specifically, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the
"ACA"), Pub. L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010), amended by the
Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, Pub. L. No.
111-152, 124 Stat. 1029 (2010) (codified as amended in various
sections of the U.S.C.) is a significant reform governing the
provision of health care in the United States. The objective of
this article is to analyze the intersection of the ACA and
Massachusetts law as it relates to banning lifetime and annual
benefit limits placed on health insurance coverage offered to
residents of the commonwealth.
Lifetime and annual benefit limits function as barriers to
consumers' ability to receive medically necessary care.
Specifically, health plans which limit the quantity of medical
visits or the dollar amount of coverage3 result in
significant medical debt for a consumer, often when the consumer is
most vulnerable due to chronic illness.
Clearly, lifetime limits have the potential to produce greater
amounts of medical debt than annual limits because annual limits
reset each year. Individuals and families whose health plans impose
these types of limits are at risk of being fully exposed to the
costs of health care and incurring charges higher than what a
private or public payer would have paid for the same
services.4
A key premise, therefore, underlying the elimination of benefit
limits in health care coverage is the fundamental unfairness
burdening medically needy consumers, especially those who are
insured and optimize preventive care treatment. The federal
government, in passing ACA's ban on lifetime limits resolved, in
part, the burden of consumer medical debt because lifetime limits
on essential benefits are prohibited for plans beginning coverage
on or after Jan. 1, 2011.5
Annual and lifetime limits within the
commonwealth
Pursuant to the commonwealth's landmark health care reform of
2006,6 all adult residents who can afford health
insurance must maintain comprehensive coverage, which in effect
protects residents from financial costs associated with necessary
medical treatment.7 Under the law and its implementing
regulations, health plans are required to provide minimum
creditable coverage ("MCC").8
Although the commonwealth's health care reform was robust enough
to require health plans to provide certain services to residents,
it did not eliminate all annual or lifetime benefit
limits.9 Specifically, the law prohibits health plans
from imposing an overall annual maximum benefit limit or annual
maximum benefit limit for covered core services.10 But
group plans, including fully-insured employer sponsored health
plans, may be permitted to offer Massachusetts residents health
benefit plans that contain lifetime or annual benefit limits on
non-core services.11
Examples of limitations that are allowed include, but are not
limited to, the following: (1) benefit limits on substance abuse
treatment to the extent consistent with federal law; (2) benefit
limits on physical therapy; (3) benefit limits on inpatient
rehabilitation care services; (4) benefit limits on durable medical
equipment.12 Notably, effective Jan. 1, 2011, annual
benefit limits are banned for prescription
drugs.13
Although most insurance plans offered to consumers in the
commonwealth do not reflect limits on benefits, annual benefit
limits are more prevalent in health plans in the commonwealth than
lifetime limits.14 Despite this, there are categories of
health plans that are more likely than others to invoke such
limits. Specifically, Young Adult Plans15 offered
through the Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector ("Connector")
and student health plans are premised on the assumption that the
risk pool consists of young, healthy adults; thus, these plans may
permit annual benefit maximums with the expectation that few would
actually exceed these limits.16
In addition, self-funded and private group health plans may
contain these annual limits. Moreover, while there is no outright
prohibition on lifetime limits, the vast majority of health plans
sold in the commonwealth have no lifetime limits.17
Health plans offered through the Connector, for example, whether
state subsidized under the Commonwealth Care program or consumer
financed under the Commonwealth Choice health plans, do not contain
lifetime benefit limits on core services.18 Nonetheless,
self-funded or private group plans may contain lifetime benefit
limits despite the strong consumer protections afforded to
commonwealth residents.
ACA - An overview of the ban on lifetime and
annual limits
The ACA restricts group health plans and issuers of group or
individual plans from using lifetime and annual health benefit
limits.19 These plans are prohibited from placing
lifetime benefit limits on essential health benefits, but are
permitted to place such limits on non-essential health
benefits.20 Likewise, under this section, these plans
are restricted to placing reasonable limits on annual benefits for
essential health benefits.21
Although the ACA does not go as far as to eliminate the practice
of using lifetime and annual per beneficiary limits, the ACA's
restrictions on these plans permit only "annual or lifetime per
beneficiary limits on specific covered benefits to the extent that
such limits are otherwise permitted under federal or state
law."22
This means that even after this section of the ACA is fully
implemented, if an employer-sponsored health plan does not want to
cover hearing aids, for instance, it may because this benefit
limitation does not run afoul of federal or state laws. The federal
law mandates that if any benefits are provided for a specific
medical condition, the ban on annual and lifetime limits must apply
for essential benefits.
Since the ACA discriminates between essential and non-essential
services, characterization of services as "essential" will prove to
be important. Currently, the secretary of the Department of Health
and Human Services ("HHS secretary") has discretion to determine
which health benefits should be considered essential, however,
"essential health benefits" must include the items and services
covered within the following general categories: (1) ambulatory
patient services; (2) emergency services; (3) hospitalization; (4)
maternity and newborn care; (5) mental health and substance use
disorder services, including behavioral health treatment; (6)
prescription drugs; (7) rehabilitative and habilitative services
and devices; (8) laboratory services; (9) preventive and wellness
services and chronic disease management; and (10) pediatric
services, including oral and vision care.23
As of late May 2011, the HHS secretary has yet to issue
regulations defining other services that will be included as
essential health benefits. Importantly, the essential benefits
package must equal in scope the benefits provided under a typical
employer-sponsored health plan.24 Until regulations are
promulgated, for purposes of enforcement, the U.S. Department of
the Treasury ("Treasury"), Department of Labor ("DOL"), and HHS
will consider a plan's good-faith efforts to comply with a
reasonable interpretation of the term "essential health
benefits."25
The ACA eliminates annual benefit limits for essential benefits as
of 2014.26 Like lifetime benefit limits, the HHS, the
DOL, and the Treasury will consider a plan or issuer's good-faith
efforts to comply with a reasonable interpretation of "essential
health benefits" until the HHS secretary promulgates
regulations.27 Importantly, the ACA's ban on annual
benefit limits does not prevent group health plans or plan issuers
from imposing an annual per beneficiary limit on specific covered
benefits that are not essential, so long as such annual limits are
otherwise permitted under state or federal law.28
Additionally, if a group health plan or issuer of a plan has not
included a particular benefit and chooses to continue to exclude
such benefit for a particular condition, the ACA's ban on annual
benefits does not mandate that the group health plan or issuer
provide the benefit.29
Until 2014, pursuant to DOL-issued interim final regulations,
there is a three-year period whereby the annual dollar limits a
health plan can impose on essential health benefits are phased
out.30 Indeed, plans or issuers are not restricted from
setting higher annual benefit limits or not imposing limits at all.
Notably, the HHS secretary must ensure that as the restrictions on
annual limits are enacted, there is a minimal impact on health plan
premiums.31 This ensures that consumers are not
inadvertently harmed by the ACA's efforts to secure affordable and
quality health insurance coverage.
Conclusion
Clearly, the elimination of annual and lifetime health benefit
limits is not a new concept in the commonwealth. But, Massachusetts
residents will benefit from the added consumer protections under
federal law. Importantly, since the federal law applies to
ERISA-governed health plans, which includes self-funded
employer-sponsored coverage, a group health plans that is outside
the scope of the commonwealth's Division of Insurance, for example,
will now have new requirements for annual and lifetime benefit
limits.
As a result, the ACA's consumer protections strengthen the
commonwealth's ability to safeguard residents' essential health
benefits and avoid the pitfalls of burdensome consumer medical
debt.
1M.G.L. c. 90, § 7N1/2 (2011).
2M.G.L c.93A § 11 (2011)
3See, e.g., Doe v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., 179 F.3d
557 (7th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, Doe v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co.,
528 U.S. 1106 (2000) (construing a challenge brought by two Chicago
residents against an insurance company that sold individual
policies with lifetime limits for benefits in treating AIDS);
McLean Hosp. Corp. v. Lasher, 819 F. Supp. 110, 126 (D. Mass 1993)
(construing benefits pursuant to a health plan that imposed a
$10,000 per lifetime benefit limit for the care or treatment of
behavioral health services).
4According to a recent study, "illness or medical bills
contributed to 52.9 percent of bankruptcies in Massachusetts" in
2009. This was less than in 2007, where "medical bankruptcies
accounted for 59.3 percent of personal bankruptcies in the state."
David U. Himmelstein, Deborah Thorne, & Steffie Woolhandler,
Medical Bankruptcy in Massachusetts: Has Health Reform Made a
Difference, 124 AM. J. MED. 224, 225 (2011).
5See, e.g., 26 C.F.R. § 54.9815-2711T(e)(3)(Ex. 1), 29
C.F.R. § 2590.715-2711(e)(3)(Ex. 1), 45 C.F.R. § 147.126(e)(3)(Ex.
1).
6An Act Providing Access to Affordable, Quality,
Accountable Health Care, St. 2006, c. 58 (codified as amended G.L.
c. 6A, 10, 17, 26, 29, 32, 62, 111, 111M, 118E, 118G, 118H, 149,
151F, 175, 176A, 176B, 176G, 176J, 176M, 176N, 176Q).
7G.L. c. 111M, 118H, 151F, 176Q.
8G.L. c. 111M, § 1; 956 CMR § 5.03.
9Specifically, the Commonwealth Health Insurance
Connector Authority has discretion to deem a health benefit plan in
compliance with MCC requirements if it determines the plan
"conforms with the regulatory requirements under 956 CMR 5.00
relating to core services (without limitation) and a 'broad range
of medical benefits'; does not fail the standards of MCC
established in 5.03(2)(f)(3); and has an actuarial value equal to
or greater than any Bronze-level plan offered through the Connector
as certified by an actuary." 956 CMR 5.03(4). Core services include
"physician services, inpatient acute care services, day surgery,
and diagnostic procedures and tests." 956 CMR 5.02. Beginning Jan.
1, 2010, a "broad range of medical benefits" was expanded to
include: (1) ambulatory patient services, including outpatient, day
surgery and related anesthesia; (2) diagnostic imaging and
screening procedures, including X-rays; (3) emergency services; (4)
hospitalization (including at a minimum, inpatient acute care
services which generally provided by an acute care hospital for
covered benefits in accordance with the member's subscriber
certificate or plan description); (5) maternity and newborn care;
(6) medical/surgical care, including preventative and primary care;
(7) mental health and substance abuse services; (8) prescription
drugs; and (9) radiation therapy and chemotherapy. 956 CMR
5.03(2)(a)(2).
10956 CMR 5.03(2)(f).
11956 CMR 5.03(2)(f)(4).
12Id.
13956 CMR 5.03(2)(f)(3).
14Mass. Div. of Ins., National Health Reform: What Does
This Mean for Massachusetts?, www.mass.gov/Eoca/docs
/advisories/nat_health_reform.pdf (last visited May 16,
2011).
15See M.G.L. c. 176J, § 10; 211 CMR 63.00.
16ROBERT W. SEIFERT & ANDREW P. COHEN, RE-FORMING
REFORM: WHAT THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT MEANS
TO MASSACHUSETTS 29 (2010), available at
http://massmedicaid.org/~/media/Files/Publications/Policy%20Publications/062110NHRReportFINAL.pdf.
17Id.
18Id.
19Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("ACA"),
Pub. L. No. 111-148, §§ 1001(5), as amended by § 10101(a), 124
Stat. 119, 131, 883 (2010) (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C.A. §
300gg-11 (West 2010)).
20Id.
21Id.
22Id.
23ACA § 1302(b), 124 Stat. 119, 163, 896 (2010)
(codified as amended at 42 U.S.C.A. § 18022 (West 2010)).
24ACA § 1302(b)(2)(A).
25Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual
Limits, Rescissions, and Patient Protections; Interim Final Rule,
75 Fed. Reg. 37188, 37191 (June 28, 2010) (to be codified at 26
C.F.R. pt 54.9815-2711T, 29 C.F.R. pt 2590.715-2711, 45 C.F.R. pt
147.126).
26ACA § 1001(5), as amended by § 10101(a).
27Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual
Limits, Rescissions, and Patient Protections; Interim Final Rule,
75 Fed. Reg. at 37191.
28ACA § 1001(5), as amended by § 10101(a); see also
Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual Limits,
Rescissions, and Patient Protections; Interim Final Rule, 75 Fed.
Reg. at 37191.
29Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual
Limits, Rescissions, and Patient Protections; Interim Final Rule,
75 Fed. Reg. at 37191.
30See ACA § 1001(5), as amended by § 10101(a).
Specifically, for plan years beginning on or after Sept. 23, 2010,
but before Sept. 23, 2011, plans may not set annual dollar limits
less than $750,000. For plan years beginning on or after Sept. 23,
2011, but before Sept. 23, 2012, plans may not set annual dollar
limits less than $1.25 million. Finally, for plan years beginning
on or after Sept. 23, 2012, but before Jan. 1, 2014, plans may not
set annual dollar limits less than $2 million. 26 C.F.R. §
54.9815-2711T(d); 29 C.F.R. § 715-2711(d); 45 C.F.R. §
147.126(d).
31ACA § 1001(5), as amended by § 10101(a) ("In defining
'restricted annual limits' the Secretary of HHS must ensure that
access to necessary services is made available with only a minimal
impact on premiums.").