Member Login
On Demand
Classifieds
Insurance
My Resources
My Practice Areas
Update Address
E-mail Preferences
My On Demand
My ePublications
My Classifieds
Member Card
Need a Lawyer?
Casemaker
Home
Membership
Member Get A Member
Appreciation Week
Member Benefits
Join/Renew Online
Dues Structure and Rates
Print an Application
Special Promotions
FAQs
Member Groups
MBA Sections/Division
Committees & Task Forces
Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee
Amicus Curiae Committee
Appellate Bench Bar Committee
Budget & Finance Committee
Crime Lab Task Force
Diversity Task Force
Education Committee
Executive Management Board
Fair and Impartial Judiciary Strike Force
Fee Arbitration Board Committee
Governance Committee
Insurance Committee
Joint Bar Committee
Joint Foreclosure Legislative Task Force
Law Day Task Force
Lawyer Referral Service Committee
Media Committee
Membership Committee
Mock Trial Committee
Plain English Jury Instruction Task Force
Tiered Mentoring Committee
Volunteer Recognition, Recruitment and Retention Task Force
Workplace Safety Task Force
CLE
MBA On Demand
CLE Programs
CLE Publications
Massachusetts Bar Institute
Events
Calendar
Event Form
2013 Annual Dinner Sponsors
For Attorneys
Casemaker
Affiliated Bar Services
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Ethical Inquiries
Fee Arbitration
Lawyers Eco-Challenge
Lawyer Referral Service
Mentor Program
Mentor Circles
Professional Development
Volunteer Opportunities
Publications
Guide to the Massachusetts Judicial Selection Process
e-Journal
Ethics Opinions
Lawyers Journal
Massachusetts Law Review
Section Review
Judicial Preference Guide
Submission Guidelines
Legislative Activities
MBA Reports
Drug Lab Crisis Resource Center
MUPC
The Legislative Process
Glossary of Legislative Terms
MBA Positions
Contacting Key Legislators
Section Council Legislative Procedures
Joint Bar Committee
Legislative Hearings
MBA memo on Senate Bill No. 2210
About the MBA
MBA Leadership
Press Room
Employees of the MBA
Mass Bar Foundation
Mass Bar Insurance
Office Locations
MBA Bylaws
Advertising with the MBA
For the Public
MBA Marathon Bombing Victims Legal Assistance Program
Need a Lawyer?
FAQs
Helpful Links
Public Service Fund
Public Information
Career Awareness
Law-Related Education
Publications
Guide to the Massachusetts Judicial Selection Process
e-Journal
Ethics Opinions
Lawyers Journal
Massachusetts Law Review
Section Review
Judicial Preference Guide
Submission Guidelines
Ethics Opinions
2010-2019
2000-2009
1990-1999
1980-1989
1973-1979
Search
1980-1989
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1983
1982
1981
1980
1982
Opinion No 82-10
Opinion No 82-9
Opinion No 82-8
Opinion No 82-7
Opinion No 82-6
Opinion No 82-5
Opinion No 82-4
Opinion No 82-3
Opinion No 82-2
Opinion No 82-1
1982
Opinion No. 82-10
Summary:
It is not improper for a lawyer or law firm to list a professional corporation of attorneys on its letterhead as "of counsel,, so long as the relationship between the lawyer or law firm and the professional corporation is such that the listing is not deceptive.
Opinion No. 82-9
Summary:
The Disciplinary Rules do not forbid per se an attorney from drafting a will in which the attorney is named a beneficiary for his parent, at his parent's request, provided that the attorney makes full disclosure of the possible effect of the disposition on his independent professional judgment.
Opinion No. 82-8
Summary:
A lawyer who has developed a settlement position with a client should dissuade the client from discussing settlement with the adversary party directly unless counsel for the adversary party has consented to such a discussion. Likewise the lawyer should not send a copy of his settlement offer directly to the adversary party without its counsel's consent; nor should he permit his client to send its own letter repeating the settlement offer to the adversary party without its counsel's consent.
Opinion No. 82-7
Summary:
A lawyer may not interview current employees of a corporate defendant without the consent of opposing counsel under DR 7-104(A)(1) when the proposed interview concerns matters within the scope of the employee's employment but may interview current employees about other matters.
Opinion No. 82-6
8K
0/B> A lawyer who is also a member of the Massachusetts legislature may represent clients before governmental entities, including state agencies, provided that (1) the representation does not violate G.L. c.268A, (2) the lawyer does not use his position as a legislator to influence or attempt to influence the governmental entity to act in favor of the client, and (3) the lawyer neither states nor implies that he is able to influence the governmental entity improperly or upon irrelevant grounds.
Opinion No. 82-5
Summary:
A lawyer, prior to instituting a class action, may properly advertise in newspaper or similar medium stating that he represents an individual client against a defendant, provided that the advertisement does not contain a deceptive statement or claim, for the purpose of determining whether there exist persons similarly situated to his client to justify bringing a class action.
Opinion No. 82-4
Summary:
An attorney who represents a real estate owner or promoter in drafting condominium documents, and in participating in the closing of titles to the condominium units, may properly act as a broker for the owner in the sales of the condominium units, provided she obtains consent from the owner or promoter after full disclosure of the possible impact of the brokerage activities on her responsibilities as attorney.
Opinion No. 82-3
Summary:
A lawyer may sell an account receivable due from a client for unpaid legal fees only with the client's consent after full disclosure.
Opinion No. 82-2
Summary:
References to a lawyer's dual professional status as an attorney and certified public accountant on his business cards and envelopes do not violate DR 2-102 or any other provision of SJC Rule 3:07.
Opinion No. 82-1
Summary:
After legal services have been rendered, an attorney may not obtain from a client a release from liability for potential malpractice claims in exchange for a reduction in the lawyer's fee, unless the client knowingly consents, after full disclosure of all possible claims and the consequences of the release, and is advised to seek independent counsel regarding the settlement.
©2013 Massachusetts Bar Association